CajunT
Full Member
“I never expect a perfect work from an imperfect man.”
Posts: 903
|
Post by CajunT on Jul 17, 2020 10:00:07 GMT 14
I believe the meeting was held earlier today. Some news will be available later today. I will post what I find out tomorrow morning. Should be interesting!
|
|
|
|
Post by cajun4life on Jul 17, 2020 10:02:02 GMT 14
I believe the meeting was held earlier today. Some news will be available later today. I will post what I find out tomorrow morning. Should be interesting! Well let’s see if he is a leader of men or a politician. I’m willing to be he is the latter. If this goes wrong, some very big money will be headed East. Both academically and athletically. |
|
|
|
Post by angeleast on Jul 17, 2020 10:06:45 GMT 14
I believe the meeting was held earlier today. Some news will be available later today. I will post what I find out tomorrow morning. Should be interesting! Can't wait to hear details |
|
|
|
Post by cajunsrock on Jul 17, 2020 11:47:05 GMT 14
I believe the meeting was held earlier today. Some news will be available later today. I will post what I find out tomorrow morning. Should be interesting! Well let’s see if he is a leader of men or a politician. I’m willing to be he is the latter. If this goes wrong, some very big money will be headed East. Both academically and athletically. I bet he will try to find middle ground in light of the political situation. He will ask not to be forced to say anything publicly to backtrack from previous statements. He may agree to no longer flash BLM at Angelle Hall and back off on diversity course requirements for graduation. No problem if these remain as electives. At worst, only liberal arts students should be required to take those. Other students will have the opportunity to take them to an ad nauseum level in the business world. In fact so many of those are now held, employees barely pay attention in them anymore. He may learn how radical the leaders of the the official BLM organization are in the meeting and could be surprised at that. Again, I don't know of anyone who has a problem with the ideal of the black lives matter phrase. Associating the school with the leaders who advocate violence to reach their goals is what some object to. There can be a middle ground here and hopefully everyone finds it. |
|
|
|
Post by facelessjonmoon on Jul 17, 2020 12:01:48 GMT 14
I believe the meeting was held earlier today. Some news will be available later today. I will post what I find out tomorrow morning. Should be interesting! Well let’s see if he is a leader of men or a politician. I’m willing to be he is the latter. If this goes wrong, some very big money will be headed East. Both academically and athletically. I think the school to the East has had very similar issues recently regarding the Marxist movement as well. Thank you for bringing light to the overall situation. The school's reaction to RP speaks volumes |
|
CajunT
Full Member
“I never expect a perfect work from an imperfect man.”
Posts: 903
|
Post by CajunT on Jul 17, 2020 12:10:59 GMT 14
Well let’s see if he is a leader of men or a politician. I’m willing to be he is the latter. If this goes wrong, some very big money will be headed East. Both academically and athletically. I bet he will try to find middle ground in light of the political situation. He will ask not to be forced to say anything publicly to backtrack from previous statements. He may agree to no longer flash BLM at Angelle Hall and back off on diversity course requirements for graduation. No problem if these remain as electives. At worst, only liberal arts students should be required to take those. Other students will have the opportunity to take them to an ad nauseum level in the business world. In fact so many of those are now held, employees barely pay attention in them anymore. He may learn how radical the leaders of the the official BLM organization are in the meeting and could be surprised at that. Again, I don't know of anyone who has a problem with the ideal of the black lives matter phrase. Associating the school with the leaders who advocate violence to reach their goals is what some object to. There can be a middle ground here and hopefully everyone finds it. |
|
|
|
Post by cajun4life on Jul 17, 2020 12:16:47 GMT 14
Well let’s see if he is a leader of men or a politician. I’m willing to be he is the latter. If this goes wrong, some very big money will be headed East. Both academically and athletically. I think the school to the East has had very similar issues recently regarding the Marxist movement as well. Thank you for bringing light to the overall situation. The school's reaction to RP speaks volumes My goal isn’t to cripple the university, but demand accountability. For 40+ years fans and donors would rather just be included in the “in” crowd. Where has that gotten us? If university administrators are allowed to operate with zero public transparency to me is unacceptable. |
|
CajunT
Full Member
“I never expect a perfect work from an imperfect man.”
Posts: 903
|
Post by CajunT on Jul 17, 2020 12:17:07 GMT 14
Well let’s see if he is a leader of men or a politician. I’m willing to be he is the latter. If this goes wrong, some very big money will be headed East. Both academically and athletically. I bet he will try to find middle ground in light of the political situation. He will ask not to be forced to say anything publicly to backtrack from previous statements. He may agree to no longer flash BLM at Angelle Hall and back off on diversity course requirements for graduation. No problem if these remain as electives. At worst, only liberal arts students should be required to take those. Other students will have the opportunity to take them to an ad nauseum level in the business world. In fact so many of those are now held, employees barely pay attention in them anymore. He may learn how radical the leaders of the the official BLM organization are in the meeting and could be surprised at that. Again, I don't know of anyone who has a problem with the ideal of the black lives matter phrase. Associating the school with the leaders who advocate violence to reach their goals is what some object to. There can be a middle ground here and hopefully everyone finds it. It sounds like you know the parties involved? Dr. Savoie is not a confrontational person and the some of the names that I've heard that were expected to attend this meeting are not as well. I wonder how many of them have decided to pull their funding and are they doing so privately? All questions that have no answers right now. |
|
|
|
Post by cajun4life on Jul 17, 2020 12:17:55 GMT 14
Well let’s see if he is a leader of men or a politician. I’m willing to be he is the latter. If this goes wrong, some very big money will be headed East. Both academically and athletically. I bet he will try to find middle ground in light of the political situation. He will ask not to be forced to say anything publicly to backtrack from previous statements. He may agree to no longer flash BLM at Angelle Hall and back off on diversity course requirements for graduation. No problem if these remain as electives. At worst, only liberal arts students should be required to take those. Other students will have the opportunity to take them to an ad nauseum level in the business world. In fact so many of those are now held, employees barely pay attention in them anymore. He may learn how radical the leaders of the the official BLM organization are in the meeting and could be surprised at that. Again, I don't know of anyone who has a problem with the ideal of the black lives matter phrase. Associating the school with the leaders who advocate violence to reach their goals is what some object to. There can be a middle ground here and hopefully everyone finds it. So basically he won’t do anything. |
|
|
|
Post by cajunsrock on Jul 17, 2020 12:22:53 GMT 14
I bet he will try to find middle ground in light of the political situation. He will ask not to be forced to say anything publicly to backtrack from previous statements. He may agree to no longer flash BLM at Angelle Hall and back off on diversity course requirements for graduation. No problem if these remain as electives. At worst, only liberal arts students should be required to take those. Other students will have the opportunity to take them to an ad nauseum level in the business world. In fact so many of those are now held, employees barely pay attention in them anymore. He may learn how radical the leaders of the the official BLM organization are in the meeting and could be surprised at that. Again, I don't know of anyone who has a problem with the ideal of the black lives matter phrase. Associating the school with the leaders who advocate violence to reach their goals is what some object to. There can be a middle ground here and hopefully everyone finds it. It sounds like you know the parties involved? Dr. Savoie is not a confrontational person and the some of the names that I've heard that were expected to attend this meeting are not as well. I wonder how many of them have decided to pull their funding and are they doing so privately? All questions that have no answers right now. I have no idea who the parties involved in his meeting are. I was just speculating in my earlier post. Trying to figure out what a political person will do. I see no way he publicly back tracks from his earlier comments. He figures that would do as much harm as good. I bet he will try to find middle ground in light of the political situation. He will ask not to be forced to say anything publicly to backtrack from previous statements. He may agree to no longer flash BLM at Angelle Hall and back off on diversity course requirements for graduation. No problem if these remain as electives. At worst, only liberal arts students should be required to take those. Other students will have the opportunity to take them to an ad nauseum level in the business world. In fact so many of those are now held, employees barely pay attention in them anymore. He may learn how radical the leaders of the the official BLM organization are in the meeting and could be surprised at that. Again, I don't know of anyone who has a problem with the ideal of the black lives matter phrase. Associating the school with the leaders who advocate violence to reach their goals is what some object to. There can be a middle ground here and hopefully everyone finds it. So basically he won’t do anything. |
|
|
|
Post by Bacca on Jul 17, 2020 12:37:03 GMT 14
It sounds like you know the parties involved? Dr. Savoie is not a confrontational person and the some of the names that I've heard that were expected to attend this meeting are not as well. I wonder how many of them have decided to pull their funding and are they doing so privately? All questions that have no answers right now. I have no idea who the parties involved in his meeting are. I was just speculating in my earlier post. Trying to figure out what a political person will do. I see no way he publicly back tracks from his earlier comments. He figures that would do as much harm as good. So basically he won’t do anything. Looks like we all are having trouble with posting with quotes. I’m going to see if we can fix that. |
|
|
|
Post by angeleast on Jul 17, 2020 12:49:02 GMT 14
Looks like we all are having trouble with posting with quotes. I’m going to see if we can fix that. Thanks its kinda confusing |
|
|
|
Post by zoomzoom on Jul 17, 2020 17:59:50 GMT 14
What concerns me the most is Savoy obviously forgot the lesson of the Trump video mess. Did he think going political would go unnoticed? Or was it arrogance or just jumping on the bandwagon?
Heck of a time to jack with donors.
Proof will be when the mascot name comes under attack once school opens.
|
|
|
|
Post by lacajunsfan on Jul 18, 2020 0:17:02 GMT 14
So here’s another point of view: T’Joe is simply trying to rectify some terrible mistakes made in the past. He may not be perfect.......none of us are.....but his actions certainly do not make him a ‘Marxist.’ Until I hear, or can otherwise verify, some horrible and egregious mistakes he he has made, I will stand by the man. I still firmly believe he is one of the best presidents we have ever had. Both academically or athletically.
|
|
|
|
Post by vobserver on Jul 18, 2020 1:25:30 GMT 14
So here’s another point of view: T’Joe is simply trying to rectify some terrible mistakes made in the past. He may not be perfect.......none of us are.....but his actions certainly do not make him a ‘Marxist.’ Until I hear, or can otherwise verify, some horrible and egregious mistakes he he has made, I will stand by the man. I still firmly believe he is one of the best presidents we have ever had. Both academically or athletically. Let me first say that I agree that he is one of the best presidents we have had. Being one of the best presidents we have ever had is both a very low bar and a ridiculously small sample size. As to him being a Marxist, I would not go quite that far; but he did publicly declare both his personal and the universities support of BLM, which is an organization that is firmly rooted in Marxist principles and led by people who are openly Marxist. That leaves us with only three possibilities. 1. He agrees with the Marxist principles of the organization he endorsed. 2. He believes that his alumni base and donor base agree with BLM. 3. He failed to do his due diligence and does not know that BLM is a Marxist organization. The first makes him at least a Marxist sympathizer. The second makes him out of touch with reality. The third makes him recklessly careless. In my opinion, any of the three are valid reasons for demanding he retire. Others may not agree with my assessment or my conclusions, but this is how I see it. |
|
